Gaussian 09 and GaussView 5
Gaussian 09 es la última version de esta serie de programas que proporciona enormes capacidades para modelado electrónico de estructuras.Todas las versiones tienen las características científicas yd e modelado, y ninguna impone limitaciones artificiales a los cálculos ,aparte de la potencia de la máquina en la que se use

Las versiones de Gaussian09 para windows y mac,se denominan gaussian 09W y Gaussian 09M respectivamente.Las licencias para Mac se licencian de la misma manera que las de Linux/Unix.La versión de 32-bit se denomina Gaussian 09IM.
Todas las versiones Linux/UNIX de Gaussian 09 funciona sobre sistemas con una sola CPU, y en paralelo con sistemas multiprocesador con memoria compartida. La versión Windows tiene versiones diferentes para la version monoprocesador y multiprocesador.


GaussView 5:Visualización y Química Extendida:
Gaussview es la más avanzada y potente interfaz gráfica para Gaussian.
Con esta herramienta usted podrá importar o construir estructuras moleculares que le interesen,monitorizar los cálculos de Gaussian, y visualizar los resultados,todo esto sin salir de la aplicación.
Además esta versión 5 incluye muchas nuevas capacidades orientadas al trabajo con grandes volumenes de aplicaciones y datos sobre química.
también proporciona soporte para los nuevos métodos de modelado incluidos en Gaussian 09.
Gaussview porporciona soporte para la importación o el trabajo con estructuras en ficheros PDB, con un método sencillo:
-seleccionar la estructura deseada del fichero multiestructura
-añadir átomos de hidrogeno automaticamente o manualmente de acuerdo a sus preferencias
-añadir átomos de hidrogeno los residuos ó a cadenas, hélices óa otras estructuras
-seleccionar átomos en los residuos o en estructuras secundarias
-determinar el residuo de cualqueir átomo seleccionado con el ratón
-Guardar al informaciónd e l residuo dentro de Gaussian 09 y sacar los resultados.

VERSIONES ANTERIORES
Gaussian 03 es la ultima
version de los programas de series de estructuras de Gaussian.
Habitualmente usado por
químicos,ingenieros,bioquimicos,físicos , y otros
investigadores pertenecientes al area química.
Desde lso principios básicos de la
química cuantica,Gaussian predice las energías,estructuras
moleculares, y frecuencias vibracionales de los sistemas
moleculares,así como propiedades moleculares.
Puede ser usado para estudiar las
moléculas y sus reacciones bajo un amplio abanico de simulación
de condiciones, cuya observación seria imposible en vivo, sin un
modelo computacional que proporciona Gaussian.

El método gaussian 03 ONIOM proporciona
la posiblidad de estudiar proteinas enteras y grandes conjuntos
de moléculas,definiendo 2 o 3 layers cuya estructura es tratada
a diferentes niveles
El método Onion proporciona mejoras para
el estudio geométrico usando algoritmos cuadráticos coplejos y
micro iteraciones
Las nuevas características de gaussian
03 repecto al metodo Oniom son:
-Personalización de los campos de fuerza
de la mecanica molecular
-Cálculos eficientes de la frecuencia
-Calculo de las propiedades magnéticas y
electricas.
Gaussian 2003 puede predecir spin-spin
constantes que se añaden al NMR.
Los sistemas periodicos en esta versión
se han ampliado, con la posibilidad de sistemas periodicos como
los polimeros, cristales bajo metodos PBC,que permiten determinar
la estructura y propiedades de estos cristales
Ademas metodos en 2 dimensiones PBC
pueden ser usados para modelar superficies , como reacciones en
superficies y catálisis
Tambien metodos en 3 dimensiones PBC le
permite ver y prever las estructuras en 3D de los cristales.
Tambien incluye un amplio rango de
espectros y propiedades como:

Cited references were chosen to be representative,
accessible overviews. However, the reference list provided should
not be considered exhaustive. For full citation lists, consult
the printed or online version of the Gaussian 03 User's
Reference.
The ONIOM facility in Gaussian 03 has been
significantly enhanced over that offered by Gaussian 98
[1-2]:
·
The ONIOM facility [42] now supports electronic embedding for
ONIOM(MO:MM) calculations: the electrostatic properties of the MM
region can be taken into account during computations on the QM
region.
o
A quadratic coupled algorithm takes into account the coupling
between atoms using internal coordinates (typically, those in the
model system) and those in Cartesian coordinates (typically, the
atoms only in the MM layer), resulting in more accurate steps.
o
MO/MM optimizations perform micro-iterations for the atoms only
in the MM layer between traditional optimization steps on the
real system, resulting in faster and more reliable optimizations.
Electronic embedding can be combined with micro-iterations.
·
Analytic frequencies are available for ONIOM(MO:MM) calculations,
and frequencies for ONIOM(MO:MO) calculations are significantly
faster.
·
Gaussian 03 provides support for general molecular mechanics (MM)
force fields, including read-in and modified parameters. A
standalone MM optimization program is also included.
·
Support for an external program for any ONIOM model (e.g., an
external MM program may be used).
The Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) solvation method has
been improved and extended [3-8]:
·
The IEFPCM model [3,9] is now the default, and analytic
frequencies are now available for this SCRF method. Additional
performance improvements include a new cavity generation
technique [10].
·
Many additional properties can be modeled in solution (discussed
later in this brochure).
·
Gaussian 03 can also produce input for Klamt's COSMO-RS
program [11], which computes solvation energies, partition
coefficients, vapor pressure and other bulk properties via
statistical mechanics techniques.
Gaussian 03 offers PBC calculations for studying
periodic systems: e.g., polymers, surfaces and crystals [12-15].
PBC calculations solve the Schrödinger equation subject to the
boundary condition that the molecule and the wavefunction repeat
indefinitely in one, two or three directions. Hartree-Fock and
DFT energies and gradients are available for periodic systems.
Dynamics calculations can provide qualitative understanding of
reaction mechanisms and quantitative details about the reaction
such as product distributions. There are two main approaches to
performing these calculations:
·
In Born-Oppenheimer Molecular Dynamics (BOMD), classical
trajectories are calculated on a local quadratic approximation to
the potential energy surface (for a review, see [16]). Our
implementation [17] uses a Hessian-based algorithm for the
predictor and corrector steps, an approach which results in a
factor of 10 or more improvement in the step size over previous
implementations. While it can make use of analytic second
derivatives, BOMD is available for all theoretical methods having
analytic gradients.
·
Gaussian 03 also offers Atom-Centered Density Matrix
Propagation (ADMP) method [18-20] molecular dynamics (available
for Hartree-Fock and DFT). Drawing on the work of Car and
Parrinello [21], ADMP propagates the electronic degrees of
freedom rather than solving the SCF equations at each nuclear
geometry. Unlike CP, ADMP propagates the density matrix rather
than the MOs. This is much more efficient if an atom-centered
basis set is being used. This approach overcomes some limitations
inherent in the CP implementation: e.g., there is no need to
substitute D for H in order to maintain energy conservation, and
both pure and hybrid DFT functionals can be used. ADMP
calculations can also be performed in the presence of a solvent
[22], and ADMP can be used in ONIOM(MO:MM) calculations.
There are additions and several enhancements to excited states
methods:
·
CASSCF calculations are now more efficient due to a new algorithm
for evaluating the CI-vector in the full configuration
interaction calculation [23]. Practical active spaces increase to
about 14 orbitals for energies and gradients (they remain at
about 8 orbitals for frequencies).
·
The Restricted Active Space (RAS) SCF method [24] is also
available[25]. RASSCF calculations partition the molecular
orbitals into five sections: the lowest lying occupieds
(considered inactive in the calculation), the RAS1 space of
doubly occupied MOs, the RAS2 space containing the most important
orbitals for the problem, the RAS3 space of weakly occupied MOs
and the remaining unoccupied orbitals (also treated as frozen by
the calculation). Thus, the active space in CASSCF calculations
is divided into three parts in a RAS calculations, and allowed
configurations are defined by specifying the minimum number of
electrons that must be present in the RAS1 space and the maximum
number that must be in the RAS3 space, in addition to the total
number of electrons in the three RAS spaces.
·
NBO orbitals for may be used for defining CAS and RAS active
spaces. These provide good initial guesses for the required
antibonding orbitals which correlate with the bonds/lone pairs of
interest.
·
The Symmetry Adapted Cluster/Configuration Interaction (SAC-CI)
method of Nakatsuji and coworkers is now included in Gaussian.
This method has many uses: predicting very accurate excited
states of organic systems, studying two-to-many electron
excitation processes such as the shake-up in the ionization
spectrum, and other problem types. For an overview of the SAC-CI
method, see [26-27].
·
Solvent Effects: Excited states can be modeled in the presence of
a solvent [28-29] using the CI-Singles and Time Dependent
Hartree-Fock and DFT methods.
Gaussian 03 provides many new molecular properties:
·
Spin-spin coupling constants [31-34], which can aid in
distinguishing conformations in magnetic spectra.
·
g tensors and other hyperfine spectra tensors [49-52]. Gaussian
03 can produce nuclear electric quadrupole constants,
rotational constants, the quartic centrifugal distortion terms,
the electronic spin rotation terms, the nuclear spin rotation
terms, the dipolar hyperfine terms and Fermi contact terms. All
tensors can be exported to Pickett's fitting and spectral
analysis program [53].
·
Harmonic vibration-rotation coupling [43-44]: A spectroscopic
property dependent on the coupling between molecules' vibrational
and rotational modes. It is used to analyze detailed rotational
spectra.
·
Anharmonic vibration and vibration-rotation coupling [44-48]:
Using perturbation theory, these higher order terms are
incorporated into frequency calculations in order to produce more
accurate results.
·
Pre-resonance Raman spectra which yield information about ground
state structures, connectivity, and vibrational states.
·
Optical Rotations/Optical Rotary Dispersion: Used to distinguish
enantiomers of chiral systems [39-41] (this property is computed
via GIAOs).
·
Electronic Circular Dichroism (ECD): This property is the
differential absorption in the visible and ultraviolet regions
for optically active molecules, and is used to assign absolute
configurations [35-36]. Predicted spectra can also be useful in
interpreting existing ECD data and peak assignments.
·
Frequency-dependent polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities,
which can be used to study how the molecular properties of
materials vary with wavelength of the incident light [37-38].
·
Magnetic susceptibilities computed with Gauge-Independent Atomic
Orbitals (GIAOs) [30]. This property is the magnetic analogue to
the electric polarizability, and it provides insight into the
diamagnetic vs. paramagnetic character of molecules.
·
Solvent Effects: Electric and magnetic properties and the various
spectra can be predicted for systems in solution as well as ones
in the gas phase [54-56].
·
Properties with ONIOM: The ONIOM method may be used with these
electric and magnetic properties.
·
Much Better Initial Guesses: Gaussian 03 uses the Harris
functional for generating initial guesses. This functional [59]
is a non-iterative approximation to DFT, and it produces initial
guesses which are better than those produced by Gaussian 98: for
example, there are modest improvements for organic systems but
very substantial improvements for compounds containing metals.
·
New SCF Convergence Algorithm: The default SCF algorithm now uses
a combination of two Direct Inversion in the Iterative Subspace
(DIIS) extrapolation methods EDIIS and CDIIS. EDIIS [58] uses
energies for extrapolation, and it dominates the early iterations
of the SCF convergence process. CDIIS, which performs
extrapolation based on the commutators of the Fock and density
matrices, handles the latter phases of SCF convergence. This new
algorithm is very reliable, and previously troublesome SCF
convergence cases now almost always converge with the default
algorithm. For the few remaining pathological convergence cases, Gaussian
03 offers Fermi broadening and damping in combination with CDIIS
(including automatic level shifting).
·
Density Fitting for Pure DFT Calculations: Gaussian 03
provides the density fitting approximation [60,61] for pure DFT
calculations. This approach expands the density in a set of
atom-centered functions when computing the Coulomb interaction
instead of computing all of the two-electron integrals. It
provides significant performance gains for pure DFT calculations
on medium sized systems too small to take advantage of the linear
scaling algorithms without a significant degradation in accuracy.
Gaussian 03 can generate an appropriate fitting basis
automatically from the AO basis, or you may select one of the
built-in fitting sets.
·
Faster and Automated FMM: The fast multipole method (FMM) in Gaussian
98 allowed the computational cost for large DFT calculations
to scale linearly with system size. In Gaussian 03,
improvements to these algorithms [57] means that their
performance gains can be realized for systems of more modest size
as well (~100 atoms for pure DFT calculations and ~150 atoms with
hybrid functionals). In addition, this feature is now fully
automated: the program invokes FMM automatically when
appropriate.
·
Coulomb Engine: Gaussian 03 incorporates a faster
algorithm for the Coulomb operator for pure DFT calculations. The
Coulomb engine produces the exact Coulomb matrix without
explicitly forming four center two electron integrals. This
substantially reduces the CPU time for the Coulomb problem in
pure DFT calculations.
·
O(N) Exact Exchange: A new algorithm for Hartree-Fock and
DFT calculations using hybrid functionals implements screening of
the exact exchange contribution via the density matrix to
eliminate the many zero value terms [62]. This technique results
in a linear computational cost for these methods without accuracy
loss.
o
B1 [72] and variations, B98 [75, 83], B97-1 [76], B97-2 [77], and
PBE1PBE [71] hybrid functionals.
o
The W1 method of Jan Martin [80-81], modified slightly to use the
UCCSD method rather than ROCCSD for open shell systems (this
method is denoted W1U). Gaussian 03 also includes the
related W1BD method, which substitutes the BD method for coupled
cluster [84]. This method is both more expensive and more
accurate than CBS-QB3 and G3.
·
Douglas-Kroll-Hess scalar relativistic Hamiltonian: This feature
allows all electron calculations for heavier atoms (first and
second transition rows) when ECPs are not accurate enough
[63-66]. For an overview, see [67-68]
| 1 |
T.
Vreven, K. Morokuma, Ö. Farkas, H. B. Schlegel, and M.
J. Frisch, J. Comp. Chem. in press (2003). |
| 2 |
T.
Vreven, I. Komáromi, S. Dapprich, K. S. Byun, J. A.
Montgomery Jr., K. Morokuma, and M. J. Frisch, in prep.
(2003). |
| 3 |
B.
Mennucci, E. Cancès, and J. Tomasi, J. Phys. Chem. B
101, 10506 (1997). |
| 4 |
B.
Mennucci and J. Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 5151 (1997). |
| 5 |
M.
Cossi, N. Rega, G. Scalmani and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys.
114, 5691 (2001). |
| 6 |
M.
Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, and V. Barone, J. Chem Phys.
117, 43 (2002). |
| 7 |
M.
Cossi, N. Rega, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, J. Comp. Chem. in
press (2003). |
| 8 |
G.
Scalmani, V. Barone, K. N. Kudin, C. S. Pomelli, G. E.
Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, Theo. Chem. Acc., submitted
(2003). |
| 9 |
E.
Cancès and B. Mennucci, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 4744 (2001). |
| 10 |
G.
Scalmani, N. Rega, M. Cossi and V. Barone, in prep.
(2003). |
| 11 |
F.
Eckert and A. Klamt, AIChE Journal 48, 369 (2002). |
| 12 |
K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, Chem. Phys. Lett. 289, 611
(1998). |
| 13 |
K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, Chem. Phys. Lett. 283, 61
(1998). |
| 14 |
K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16440
(2000). |
| 15 |
O.
V. Yazyev, K. N. Kudin, and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Rev. B
65, art. no. 205117 (2002). |
| 16 |
K.
Bolton, W. L. Hase, and G. H. Peshlherbe, in Modern
Methods for Multidimensional Dynamics Computation in
Chemistry, Ed. D. L. Thompson (World Scientific,
Singapore, 1998) 143. |
| 17 |
J.
M. Millam, V. Bakken, W. Chen, W. L. Hase, and B. H.
Schlegel, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 3800 (1999). |
| 18 |
H.
B. Schlegel, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, G. A. Voth, A.
D. Daniels, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem.
Phys. 114, 9758 (2001). |
| 19 |
S.
S. Iyengar, H. B. Schlegel, J. M. Millam, G. A. Voth, G.
E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10291
(2001). |
| 20 |
H.
B. Schlegel, S. S. Iyengar, X. Li, J. M. Millam, G. A.
Voth, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys.
117, 8694 (2002). |
| 21 |
R.
Car and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2471 (1985). |
| 22 |
N.
Rega, S. S. Iyengar, G. A. Voth, H. B. Schlegel, G. E.
Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch, in prep. (2003). |
| 23 |
M.
Klene, M. A. Robb, M. J. Frisch, and P. Celani, J. Chem.
Phys. 113, 5653 (2000). |
| 24 |
J.
Olsen, B. O. Roos, P. Jorgensen, and H. J. A. Jensen, J.
Chem. Phys. 89, 2185 (1988). |
| 25 |
M.
Klene, M. A. Robb, L. Blancafort, and M. J. Frisch, in
prep (2003). |
| 26 |
H.
Nakatsuji, in Computational Chemistry-Reviews of Current
Trends, Ed. J. Leszcynski, Vol. 2 (World Scientific,
Singapore, 1997) 62-124. |
| 27 |
M.
Ehara, M. Ishida, K. Toyota, and H. Nakatsuji, in Reviews
in Modern Quantum Chemistry, Ed. K. D. Sen (World
Scientific, Singapore, 2002) 293. |
| 28 |
B.
Mennucci, R. Cammi, and J. Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 109,
2798 (1998). |
| 29 |
M.
Cossi and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 4708 (2001). |
| 30 |
K.
Ruud, T. Helgaker, K. L. Bak, P. Jorgensen, and H. J. A.
Jensen, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3847 (1993). |
| 31 |
V.
Sychrovsky, J. Grafenstein, and D. Cremer, J. Chem. Phys.
113, 3530 (2000). |
| 32 |
T.
Helgaker, M. Watson, and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 113,
9402 (2000). |
| 33 |
V.
Barone, J. E. Peralta, R. H. Contreras, and J. P. Snyder,
J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 5607 (2002). |
| 34 |
J.
E. Peralta, R. H. Contreras, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J.
Frisch, and G. E. Scuseria, in prep. (2003). |
| 35 |
K.
L. Bak, P. Jorgensen, T. Helgaker, K. Ruud, and H. J. A.
Jensen, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 8873 (1993). |
| 36 |
J.
Autschbach, T. Ziegler, S. J. A. van Gisbergen, and E. J.
Baerends, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6930 (2002). |
| 37 |
J.
E. Rice and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 4959 (1991). |
| 38 |
J.
E. Rice and N. C. Handy, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 43, 91
(1992). |
| 39 |
T.
Helgaker, K. Ruud, K. L. Bak, P. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen,
Faraday Discuss. 99, 165 (1994). |
| 40 |
P.
J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J. Frisch,
and C. Rosini, Organic Letters 4, 4595 (2002). |
| 41 |
P.
J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J. Frisch,
O. Bortolini, and P. Besse, Chirality 14, (2002). |
| 42 |
S.
Dapprich, I. Komáromi, K. S. Byun, K. Morokuma, and M.
J. Frisch, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 462, 1 (1999). |
| 43 |
W.
H. Miller, in Potential Energy Surfaces and Dynamical
Calculations, Ed. D. G. Truhlar (Plenum, New York, 1981)
265. |
| 44 |
V.
Barone, J. Comp. Chem. in prep. (2003). |
| 45 |
W.
H. Miller, N. C. Handy, and J. E. Adams, J. Chem. Phys.
72, 99 (1980). |
| 46 |
D.
A. Clabo, W. D. Allen, R. B. Remington, Y. Yamaguchi, and
H. F. Schaefer III, Chemical Physics 123, 187 (1988). |
| 47 |
C.
Minichino and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3717 (1994). |
| 48 |
V.
Barone and C. Minichino, Theochem 330, 365 (1995). |
| 49 |
R.
F. Curl Jr., Mol. Phys. 9, 585 (1965). |
| 50 |
J.
Gauss, K. Ruud, and T. Helgaker, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2804
(1996). |
| 51 |
V.
Barone, Chem. Phys. Lett. 262, 201 (1996). |
| 52 |
F.
Neese, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 11080 (2001). |
| 53 |
H.
M. Pickett, J. Mol. Spec. 148, 317 (1991). |
| 54 |
J.
Tomasi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Cappelli, and S. Corni,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 5697 (2002). |
| 55 |
B.
Mennucci, J. Tomasi, R. Cammi, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J.
Frisch, F. J. Devlin, S. Gabriel, and P. J. Stephens, J.
Phys. Chem. A 106, 6102 (2002). |
| 56 |
C.
Cappelli, S. Corni, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, and J. Tomasi,
J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 12331 (2002). |
| 57 |
K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 2351
(1999). |
| 58 |
K.
N. Kudin, G. E. Scuseria, and E. Cancès, J. Chem. Phys.
116, 8255 (2002). |
| 59 |
J.
Harris, Phys. Rev. B. 31, 1770 (1985). |
| 60 |
B.
I. Dunlap, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 3140 (1983). |
| 61 |
B.
I. Dunlap, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 529, 37 (2000). |
| 62 |
J.
C. Burant, K. Kudin, G. E. Scuseria, G. W. Trucks, and M.
J. Frisch, in prep. (2003). |
| 63 |
M.
Douglas and N. M. Kroll, Ann. Phys. (NY) 82, 89 (1974). |
| 64 |
B.
A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A 32, 756 (1985). |
| 65 |
B.
A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A 33, 3742 (1986). |
| 66 |
G.
Jansen and B. A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6016 (1989). |
| 67 |
M.
Barysz and A. J. Sadlej, Theochem 573, 181 (2001). |
| 68 |
W.
A. deJong, R. J. Harrison, and D. A. Dixon, J. Chem.
Phys. 114, 48 (2001). |
| 69 |
N.
C. Handy and A. J. Cohen, Mol. Phys. 99, 403 (2001). |
| 70 |
J.
P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.
77, 3865 (1996). |
| 71 |
J.
P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.
78, 1396 (1997). |
| 72 |
A.
D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1040 (1996). |
| 73 |
T.
Van Voorhis and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 400
(1998). |
| 74 |
A.
D. Boese and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 5497
(2001). |
| 75 |
H.
L. Schmider and A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9624
(1998). |
| 76 |
F.
A. Hamprecht, A. J. Cohen, D. J. Tozer, and N. C. Handy,
J. Chem. Phys. 109, 6264 (1998). |
| 77 |
P.
J. Wilson, T. J. Bradley, and D. J. Tozer, J. Chem. Phys.
115, 9233 (2001). |
| 78 |
L.
A. Curtiss, K. Raghavachari, P. C. Redfern, V. Rassolov,
and J. A. Pople, J. Chem Phys. 109, 7764 (1998). |
| 79 |
L.
A. Curtiss, P. C. Redfern, K. Raghavachari, V. Rassolov,
and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4703 (1999). |
| 80 |
S.
Parthiban and J. M. L. Martin, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6014
(2001). |
| 81 |
J.
M. L. Martin and G. de Oliveira, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 1843
(1999). |
| 82 |
E.
V. R. de Castro and F. E. Jorge, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5225
(1998). |
| 83 |
A.
D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 8554 (1997). |
| 84 |
J.
A. Montgomery Jr., M. J. Frisch, and J. M. L. Martin, in
prep (2003) |
| |
|
New features are indicated in deep indigo.
Customize many aspects of GaussView functionality: